Cameron Norrie vs Jenson Brooksby Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 May at 09:19 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Norrie vs J. Brooksby

GBR
3
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Norrie 3 - 0 Brooksby
They have played 6 sets in total, with Cameron Norrie winning 6 and Jenson Brooksby winning 0. The last match between Cameron Norrie and Jenson Brooksby was at the Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva, 18-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Cameron Norrie getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Norrie | 3 |
| Brooksby | 0 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva(05-18-25)
(SF) ASB Classic - Auckland(01-13-23)
(QF) Korea Open - Seoul(09-30-22)
C. Norrie vs J. Brooksby H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $9,320,130 | Career Prize Money | $2,553,345 |
| 61.73% (413-256) | Career Total W/L | 63.45% (184-106) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 7 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 56.67% (34-26) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.33% (21-15) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
C. Norrie vs J. Brooksby Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve points, Brooksby's recent form shows a higher success rate of 46.78%, compared to Norrie's 42.7%. Could this impact the match outcome? Possibly, as higher second serve effectiveness often correlates with match success.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Brooksby slightly outperforms Norrie, winning 47.86% of points in recent form, whereas Norrie secures 47.4%.
- For first serve returns, Brooksby again has the upper hand, winning 28.35% of points compared to Norrie's 25.85%.
- Norrie demonstrates superior skill under pressure, saving 59.16% of breakpoints, while Brooksby saves 50%. Could this edge give Norrie an advantage in crucial moments? Quite possibly.
- Brooksby has enjoyed better match success over the past year with a 57.89% win rate, while Norrie has a 48.98% win rate.
- Norrie's preferred surface is hard courts, boasting a winning percentage of 67%, whereas Brooksby excels on clay with a 68% win rate.
- Both players have predominantly competed on the Main tour this year, but Brooksby holds an impressive 88.89% success rate compared to Norrie's 52%.
- In prior head-to-head encounters, Norrie has consistently outperformed Brooksby, winning both matches without dropping a set.
- Despite similar average opponent rankings in the past year, Brooksby's opponents have been slightly higher-ranked, with an average of 126.68, while Norrie's opponents averaged 140.29 in rank.
- Brooksby excels in deciding set situations, winning 67% of such matches over the past year, whereas Norrie has achieved a 50% success rate.
- Both players have comparable break point conversion stats, with Brooksby at 33.86% and Norrie at 32.86%, indicating similar effectiveness in capitalizing on opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (May 17, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the upcoming match between Norrie and Brooksby, certain patterns and stats draw attention. Brooksby's recent form shows a slight edge in second serve performance and return game metrics, crucial areas often tied to match outcomes.
Norrie's ability to save breakpoints offers a notable advantage during high-pressure instances, providing him with opportunities to shift momentum. His head-to-head record against Brooksby further supports his potential for success.
While Brooksby has shown stronger year-long performance metrics, particularly on clay courts, the match taking place on a hard surface could tilt the balance towards Norrie, who has a proven track record.
Taking into account overall stats and past performance, Cameron Norrie appears to have the edge as the likely winner in this match-up, particularly given his previous head-to-head victories and adeptness on hard courts.
Cameron Norrie vs Jenson Brooksby Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Norrie vs J. Brooksby H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 36 | Games Won | 18 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:30:35 | Average Match Time | 1:30:35 |
| 69% (110/160) | 1st Serve % | 61% (118/193) |
| 76% (84/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (69/118) |
| 56% (28/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (31/75) |
| 40% (12/30) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (4/14) |
| 48% (93/193) | Return Points Win % | 30% (48/160) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Norrie Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | L | 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) | ||
SF | W | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-7(1) 7-6(7) 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | ||
J. Brooksby Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-7(6) 6-4 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 1-6 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(2) 6-1 | ||

C. Norrie vs J. Brooksby Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.73% (413/256) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.45% (184/106) |
| 58.06% (972/702) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.54% (415/282) |
| 53.05% (8526/7546) | Games Win/Loss | 53.65% (3465/2994) |
| 66.48% (234/118) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.64% (112/64) |
| 62.76% (91/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.96% (31/16) |
| 52.25% (58/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.79% (27/16) |
| 49.18% (30/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 58.33% (14/10) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2820 | Aces Total | 584 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1706 | Total Double Faults | 403 |
| 1:38:18 | Average Match Time | 1:33:53 |
| 345.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 341.62 |
| 65% (30434/46961) | 1st Serve % | 66% (12065/18334) |
| 70% (21373/30434) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (8079/12065) |
| 51% (8365/16527) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3229/6269) |
| 42% (1896/4474) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (815/1842) |
| 39% (18368/47243) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7487/18333) |
| 59.49% (47/32) | Slam W/L | 61.29% (19/12) |
| 55.17% (64/52) | Masters W/L | 54.55% (18/15) |
| 46.43% (13/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.07% (160/102) | Main Tour W/L | 63.77% (44/25) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.36% (71/36) | Challenger W/L | 64.29% (36/20) |
| 77.33% (58/17) | Futures W/L | 66.34% (67/34) |
| 62% (366/589) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (166/260) |
| 57% (43/76) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 51% (119/233) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (48/78) |
| 60% (137/227) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (48/80) |
| 86% (398/343) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (172/155) |
| 13% (398/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (172/17) |
| 25% (271/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (118/28) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
